Supreme Court of Missouri· 4/13/1999
Treadway v. State
Citations
- 988 S.W.2d 508
- 1999 Mo. LEXIS 21
- 1999 WL 203545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Unconstitutionality of a special law is presumed and there must be ‘substantial justification’ for excluding other political subdivisions.” (internal citations omitted)
- discussing briefly CAA standards for ozone pollution and non-attainment classifications.
- “The fact that currently the statute applies only to the St. Louis metropolitan region does not necessarily make the act a special law because the act can apply to other counties that attain the same statutory criteria in the future.”
- \The fact that currently the statute applies only to the St. Louis metropolitan region does not necessarily make the act a special law because the act can apply to other counties that attain the same statutory criteria in the future.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton, Covington, Holstein, Limbaugh, Price, Stith, White, Wolff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Douglas Cosby v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Missouri· 2019-06-25· cited 60×
- Jefferson County Fire Protection Districts Ass'n v. BluntSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-21· cited 22×
- City of St. Louis v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-11-13· cited 16×
- Amick v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 2014-04-15· cited 10×
- City of Normandy v. GreitensSupreme Court of Missouri· 2017-05-16· cited 7×
- Motiva Enterprises LLC v. Secretary of Department of Natural Resources & Environmental ControlSuperior Court of Delaware· 1999-08-17· cited 6×
- Jackson County v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-21· cited 5×
- Jeffrey S. Amick v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 2014-04-15
- In the matter of the petition of Missouri-American Water Company for approval to change its infrastructure system replacement surcharge (ISRS), Missouri Public Service Commission v. Office of Public CounselMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-03-08
- City of Aurora, Missouri, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Spectra Communications Group, LLC, d/b/a CenturyLink, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.Supreme Court of Missouri· 2019-12-24
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fust v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-06-17· cited 61×
- Bopp v. SpainhowerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1975-02-10· cited 36×
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1953-06-08· cited 35×
- State ex rel. Donham v. YancySupreme Court of Missouri· 1894-06-25· cited 27×
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-10-24· cited 26×
- State Ex Rel. City of Blue Springs v. RiceSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-05-25· cited 21×
- Tillis v. City of BransonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-05-27· cited 17×
- Chaffin v. County of ChristianSupreme Court of Missouri· 1962-09-10· cited 16×
- School District of Riverview Gardens v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri· 1991-09-24· cited 11×
- State ex rel. City of Ellisville v. St. Louis County Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Missouri· 1994-05-26· cited 4×
- Manchester Fire Protection District v. St. Louis County Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Missouri· 1977-09-12· cited 2×
- Zimmerman v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-02-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.