Trax-Fax, Inc. v. Hobba

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that OCGA § 34-9-245 was statute of repose rather than statute of limitation, given that it had \similar prohibitive language\ to other statutes of repose, and given that a separate statute provided a statute of limitation for workers' compensation reimbursement claims
• concluding that OCGA § 34-9-245 was statute of repose rather than statute of limitation, given that it had “similar prohibitive language” to other statutes of repose, and given that a separate statute provided a statute of limitation for workers’ compensation reimbursement claims
• “[EJrroneous applications of law to undisputed facts . . . are subject to a de novo standard of review.”
• “[E]rroneous applications of law to undisputed facts . . . are subject to a de novo standard of review.”
• “[U]nlike a statute of limitation, a statute of repose generally cannot be waived, if not initially pled, or tolled.”
• fee award authorized where defense was in part unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).