Travis Washington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evaluations of the defendant’s competency that were six months to a year old were stale
• holding that trial court abused its discretion by relying on three competency reports ranging from six months to one year old
• holding competency evaluations that were six months to one year old were stale and did not constitute competent, substantial evidence of competency
• \The trial court should not find a defendant competent where the record provides no reason to reject overwhelming and uncontested expert testimonies to the contrary.\ (quoting Duncan v. State, 115 So. 3d 1121, 1121 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).