Travis v. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that comment f didn’t apply because policy didn’t contain “special statutory forms”
• finding factor neutral where it pointed to Missouri but “no party argues Missouri law should apply”
• “The Court therefore must determine ‘whether the polic[ies’] definition of “pollutant” applies unambiguously to’ the noxious odors identified in the [underlying] Complaint.”
• “Indiana has an interest in whether the potential liability in the underlying action is covered because the harm is allegedly caused by a farm located in Indiana and suffered by Indiana residents and property.”
• “Indiana has an interest in whether the potential liability in the Cook Action is covered because the harm is allegedly caused by a farm located in Indiana and suffered by Indiana residents and property.”
• “Pennsylvania also has an interest in having its law applied to an insurance policy issued by insurers licensed to do business in Pennsylvania to two Pennsylvania corporations that have their principal places of business in Pennsylvania.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).