District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 8/28/1964
Travis v. Travis
Citations
- 203 A.2d 173
- 1964 D.C. App. LEXIS 276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- wife’s self help in collecting alimony did not so materially violate the terms of the separation agreement as to entitle husband to refuse performance on his part
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hood, Quinn, Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Burtoff v. BurtoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-08-20· cited 21×
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District of Columbia· 2009-06-25· cited 18×
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1970-08-03· cited 14×
- Willcher v. WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-07-11· cited 12×
- Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1965-05-12· cited 9×
- Gabrielian v. GabrielianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-03-07· cited 7×
- Nesbit v. NesbitNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 5×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Audubon v. ShufeldtSupreme Court· 1901-05-20· cited 181×
- Gagnon v. WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1964-04-30· cited 23×
- Lester C. Norris v. Pauline N. NorrisNinth Circuit· 1963-11-19· cited 19×
- Cooper v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1944-02-04· cited 19×
- Le Bert-Francis v. Le Bert-FrancisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-11-04· cited 17×
- Landa v. AstinD.C. Circuit· 1951-11-29· cited 9×
- Le Bert-Francis v. Le Bert-FrancisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1961-12-07· cited 8×
- Hammond v. HammondDistrict of Columbia· 1942-11-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.