Skip to main content

Travis v. State

Citations

  • 969 So. 2d 532
  • 2007 WL 4145145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding reversible error occurred where the trial court failed to renew the offer of counsel prior to sentencing even though sentencing proceeded immediately after the dismissal of the jury
  • “Sentencing is a crucial stage of a criminal proceeding, so that the offer of assistance of counsel must be renewed then, even if the defendant has previously waived counsel at other stages.”
  • “Sentencing is a crucial stage of a criminal proceeding, so that the offer of assistance of counsel must be renewed then, even if the defendant has previously waived counsel at other stages.”
  • characterizing as reversible error the trial court’s failure to renew the offer of counsel before 3 The supreme court and other courts sometimes use the term “critical” rather than “crucial.” See, e.g., Woodbury v. State, 320 So. 3d 631, 650–51 (Fla. 2021
  • “Because the failure to renew the offer of counsel at the commencement of the sentencing hearing constitutes reversible error, Appellant is entitled to be re-sentenced after a proper Faretta inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.