Travis v. Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Deciding the case was ripe for adjudication because plaintiffs “were not challenging an entire program, or ‘rules of general applicability,’ ... but rather their implementation in a particular instance.”
• finding “that Congress and other third parties would have to act before actual development could take place is not dispositive” on injury in fact inquiry
• recommendation against wilderness designation for roadless areas in Idaho Panhandle Forest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).