Travis John Alvarez v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one panel of this court may not overrule another absent en banc reconsideration or superseding contrary Supreme Court decision
• holding that a panel of this court may not overrule a decision made by a prior panel absent en banc consideration, a change in relevant statutory law, or an intervening decision by the Supreme Court
• “Although the Butler Court did hold that the Tenth Amendment cabined Congress’s spending power, the Court quickly abandoned this view[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).