Travers v. Flight Services & Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a factual “dispute [is] genuine if a reasonable jury, drawing favorable inferences, could resolve it in favor of the nonmoving party”
• explaining that a factual “dispute [is] genuine of a reasonable jury, drawing favorable inferences, 8 could resolve it in favor on the nonmoving party”
• explaining that a factual “dispute [is] genuine if a reasonable jury, drawing favorable inferences, could resolve it in favor of the nonmoving party”
• requiring more than “conclusory allegations, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation … to establish a genuine dispute of fact”
• reversing grant of summary judgment on a retaliation claim because the employer’s discretionary policy could have allowed a jury to conclude that an employee “might well have been spared . . . but for a desire to get rid of him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).