· 2/20/1985
Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. Zotal, Ltd.
Citations
- 474 N.E.2d 1070
- 394 Mass. 95
- 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 487
- 1985 Mass. LEXIS 1332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that in an F.O.B. contract, the place of delivery is ordinarily where the seller places the goods into the hands of the carrier at the seller’s place of business
- refusing to address request for a stay which had not been raised in the trial court or raised as an issue in initial brief
- “it is well established that the buyer’s obligation to pay for goods tendered and accepted does not arise under the ‘same contract’ as the alleged breach of an exclusive dealing or distributing arrange ment by the seller”
- declining to consider issue not raised in principal brief
- issue not raised in principal brief not considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Liacos, Abrams, Lynch, O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.