Skip to main content
· 11/10/1966

Travelstead & Sons Construction Co. v. Iglehart

Citations

  • 244 Md. 296
  • 223 A.2d 579
  • 1966 Md. LEXIS 436

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing various “[f]actors used by courts to determine the propriety of piercing the corporate veil”
  • finding lack of general jurisdiction because nonresident corporation did not have a physical location, officers, employees, bank accounts, or a general plan for regular business in Michigan
  • “The trial court erred by failing to comply on remand with the very specific directives of this Court.”
  • “[The defendant] came forward with documentary evidence to dispute plaintiffs’ allegations, but the trial court incorrectly continued to construe the allegations in plaintiffs’ pleadings as true.”
  • setting forth the same factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McWilliams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.