Travelers Indem. Co. v. Fishbach, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a reapportionment plan submitted to a court by the legislative body of a covered jurisdiction was a legislative plan
• holding that a section in a prior opinion was unnecessary to resolve that case and therefore was not controlling in a subsequent case
• holding that a section in a prior opinion was unnecessary to resolve that case and therefore was not controlling in a subsequent case
• voting changes contained in federal-court order require preclearance if they were proposed by the covered jurisdiction
• voting changes contained in federal-court order require preclearance if they were proposed by the covered jurisdiction
• \[T]he Act's preclearance requirement does not apply to plans prepared and adopted by a federal court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).