Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, etc. v. Crystal Marie Harrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the limitations in section 627.727(9) cannot take effect unless “the insurer informs the insured of the limitations of such coverage and the insured executes an approved form expressly electing non-stacking coverage”
• describing a “long line of well-established precedent” under which a vehicle cannot be treated as “both insured and uninsured under the same policy”
• describing a \long line of well- established precedent\ under which a vehicle cannot be treated as \both insured and uninsured under the same policy\
• framing the issue as whether a policy exclusion \conflicts\ with the provisions of the statute
• addressing a “family vehicle exclusion”
• addressing a \family vehicle exclusion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).