Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Transcontinental Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a provision’s placement in an insurance policy supplied necessary context for policy interpretation
• concluding that a provision’s placement in an insurance policy supplied necessary context for policy interpretation
• concluding that, unlike in Community Redevelopment Agency, language of excess policy was ‘‘ ‘sufficiently clear’ ’’ to trigger defense obligations of excess insurer upon exhaustion of underlying insurance as defined in policy, regardless of existence of other insurance
• interpreting insurer’s duty to defend under policy language with two types of coverage where (a) “other insurance” language specifically was included in coverage provision that did not apply, (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).