Travel Opportunities v. Walter Karl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that selling nineteen lists of customers over a two- year period did not constitute general course of business activity in the state for pecuniary benefit
• holding Florida court had no personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendant under section 48.193(1)(a
• holding Florida court had no personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendant under section 48.193(1)(a
• \[I]t is not necessary for a defendant to have a physical presence in a state for jurisdiction to attach.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).