TRATHEN, RICHARD J., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a party may not avoid summary judgment by resorting to speculation, conjecture, or fantasy”
• granting summary judgment because the nonmoving party failed to “identify record evidence” to support its argument and instead relied on “speculation”
• “[I]t is well-established in our case law that a party may not avoid summary judgment by resorting to ‘speculation, conjecture, or fantasy.’”
• a “party may not avoid summary judgment by resorting to speculation [or] conjecture” (quotation omitted)
• “[A] party may not avoid summary judgment by resorting to ‘speculation[ or] conjecture . . . .’” (citation omitted)
• “[A] party may not avoid summary judgment by resorting to speculation, conjecture, or fantasy.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).