Trapagnier & Bros. v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Fla. Stat. § 77.16 “does not vitiate all other rules applicable to the determination of claims and if the facts of a particular case warrant, summary ruling, on the question of title to the garnished property, is appropriate”
• “where a claimant asserts a right to garnished property it is the duty of the court to try the controversy and determine the rights of the parties, and, in Florida, such trial may be had by jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).