Transportation & Transit Associates, Inc. v. Morrison Knudsen Corporation, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment when plaintiff could not show one instance of damages
• affirming summary judgment when plaintiff could not show one instance of damages
• “On TTA’s understanding of what ¶4 means, MKC broke its promise; neither MKC nor Amerail (after the delegation in 1995
• Although the demonstration of damages “need not be precise,” the plaintiff must have “a sensible basis for its claim.”
• “On TTA’s under- standing of what ¶ 4 means, MKC broke its promise; neither MKC nor Amerail (after the delegation in 1995
• “the party claiming the breach must establish the amount of damages. The demonstration need not be precise, . . . but the plaintiff must have a sensible basis for its claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).