Transportation Guarantee Co. v. Jellins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contractual promise to perform maintenance on and procure insurance for a truck was not “insurance” because “the major part of [Party A’s] service [to Party B] is the supplying of labor”
• holding that the relevant question is not “whether risk is involved or assumed,” but rather “whether that or something else to which it is related in the particular plan is its principal object and purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).