TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 100 v. NYC Transit Auth.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following Conroy and holding that “the general diagnosis requirement [is] an inquiry within the meaning of the ADA prohibition, because it may tend to reveal a disability”
• employer presented “compelling evidence,” a mass of statistics and anecdotal evidence of the costs of sick leave usage and the “significant level of sick leave abuse” among the city workers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).