TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 100 v. New York City Transit Auth.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that certification of an interlocutory appeal was appropriate where the case “raise[d] a novel issue of great importance to many [others in the industry]” and the case “may therefore have considerable precedential value”
• noting that certification of an interlocutory appeal was appropriate where the case “raise[d] a novel issue of great importance to many [others in the industry]” and the case “may therefore have considerable precedential value”
• allowing interlocutory appeal on an issue of first impression where the court “heard evidence and issued a final decision, on a full factual record”
• allowing interlocutory appeal on an issue of first impression where the court “heard evidence and issued a final decision, on a full factual record”
• \Certification is to be reserved for the exceptional case in which the law is fundamentally uncertain.\
• “Certification is to be reserved for the exceptional case in which the law is fundamentally uncertain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).