Transport Indemnity Co. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that phrase “arising out of’ in insurance policy did not require traditional proximate cause
• equating self-retention provision to self- insurance, as a “form of deductible”
• uniform interpretation of motor carrier insurance contracts implements federal policy to ensure authorized carrier responsibility
• policy providing primary coverage with\other insurance\ clause must pay before policy \that extends only excess coverage\
• policy providing primary coverage with “other insurance” clause must pay before policy “that extends only excess coverage”
• “In such a situation the excess insurance clause should not be extended to cover an amount for which the insured [] has bargained to become a ‘self-insurer.’” (citation and quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).