Skip to main content
· 10/20/2023

TransPerfect Global, Inc. v. Pincus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that courts “do not lightly assume that Congress has omitted from its adopted text re- quirements that it nonetheless intends to apply”
  • concluding that contract stating that \Lender may send [Plaintiff] a written notice\ does not impose mandatory obligation
  • holding that, under § 1231(b)(2)(E)(iv), an alien may be removed to the country in which he or she was born even if that country’s government has not given its prior consent
  • holding that, under § 1231(b)(2)(E)(iv), an alien may be removed to the country in which he or she was born even if that country’s government has not given its prior consent
  • holding that Congress could not have ratified a “settled construction” of a statute, because there was no “judicial consensus so broad and unquestioned that we must presume Congress knew of and endorsed, it”
  • stating that there is a “customary policy of deference to the President in matters of foreign affairs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traynor J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.