Transit Casualty Company, Etc. v. Security Trust Company, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Rule 60(b)(1) and Rule 60(b)(6) are not pari passu and are mutually exclusive” such that “[t]he reason for relief set forth in Rule 60(b)(1) cannot be the basis for relief under Rule 60(b)(6)”
• stating that a Rule 60(b) motion “can be made even though an appeal has been taken and is pending”
• construing Rule 60(b)(5) motion as Rule 60(b)(6) motion after determining, under Bailey, that relief was unavailable under Rule 60(b)(5)
• “Although plaintiffs appealed from the order of dismissal, such appeal does not toll the time for making a 60(b) motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).