Transcom, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• first citing 19 U.S.C. § 1675 (a) (1994) ; then citing 19 C.F.R. §§ 353.22 , 353.31 (1995)
• first citing 19 U.S.C. § 1675(a) (1994); then citing 19 C.F.R. §§353.22, 353.31 (1995)
• “Indeed, it would be anomalous to expect a member of the industry to inquire whether the agency is aware of the applicable statutes, regulations and pertinent case law, or whether the agency actually meant to make the unambiguous statement it made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).