Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. And Performance Contracting Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “finding an issue of material fact as to whether the patent in issue was sufficient to have apprised a skilled artisan of what was needed to practice the best mode of the invention”
• “The legislative history of section 120 does not indicate any congressional intent to alter the Supreme Court’s interpretation of continuing application prac- tice.”
• “The PTO has noted that the expressions ‘continuation,’ ‘divisional,’ and ‘continuation-in-part’ are merely terms used for administrative convenience.”
• “A ‘continuation’ application claims the same invention claimed in an earlier application, although there may be some variation in the scope of the subject matter claimed.”
• “A ‘continuation’ application claims the same invention claimed in an earlier application, although there may be some variation in the scope of the subject matter claimed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).