Skip to main content
· 1/18/2007

Transclean Corporation v. Jiffy Lube International

Citations

  • 474 F.3d 1298
  • 81 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1400
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 980
  • 2007 WL 117748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • judicial estoppel precludes a party from “revers[ing] course . . . late in the proceedings simply because it now realizes its litigation strategy was unsuccessful”
  • judicial estoppel precludes a party from “revers[ing] course . . . late in the proceedings simply because it now realizes its litigation strategy was unsuccessful”
  • “[A] party may be judicially estopped from asserting clearly inconsistent positions on claim construction, which is a question of law.”
  • “a 9 manufacturer or seller of a product who is sued for patent infringement typically is not in privity 10 with a party, otherwise unrelated, who does no more than purchase and use the product”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Plager, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.