Transcanada Pipelines Limited v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, No. 87-1229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “FERC acknowledged this evidence and ignored it as irrelevant. We agree that this evidence, by itself, fails to contradict FERC’s [ ] theory.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).