· 9/4/1992
Transamerica Insurance Corporation, Inc., for and on Behalf of Stroup Sheet Metal Works v. The United States
Citations
- 973 F.2d 1572
- 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,374
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 1281
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20875
- 1992 WL 213073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \certain 'magic words' need not be used and that the intent of the 'claim' governs\
- agreeing with Transamerica’s assertion that the CDA requires that the government dispute the contractor’s right to additional compensation
- stating that “[tjhis court will not require contractors to do more than to comply as fully and reasonably as possible with the statutory requirements of the CDA when this court has definitively stated that certain ‘magic words’ need not be used”
- submitting letter to contracting officer’s authorized representative indicates implied request for final decision
- asking whether “the contractor desires by its submissions ... a final decision”
- “[Certain magic words need not be used and ... the intent of the claim governs.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lourie, Bennett, Rader
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.