Skip to main content
· 12/20/1984

Trans-World Manufacturing Corp., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Al Nyman & Sons, Inc., and Al-Site Corporation, Appellants/cross-Appellees

Citations

  • 750 F.2d 1552
  • 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 259
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permanent injunction follows decision in favor of complainant unless some special reason exists for refusing it
  • \the jury returned answers to special interrogatories in which it found . . . that Trans-World intended to deceive the Patent and Trademark Office\
  • court erred in excluding evidence of infringer’s actual profits, but appellate court gave no opinion on weight to be given that evidence
  • “Evidence of the infringer’s actual profits generally is admissible as probative of his anticipated profits.”
  • “Evidence of the infringer’s profits generally is admissible as probative of his anticipated profits.”
  • increased sales of unpatented items may be relevant in determining reasonable royalty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Cowen, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.