Tenth Circuit· 4/12/2007

Trammell v. McKune

Citations

485 F.3d 546
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8394
2007 WL 1087329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that suppressed evidence may have been used to support defense theory that another person committed the offense
explaining that suppressed evidence could also have been used to east doubt on police officers’ decision to focus their investigation on habeas petitioner, rather than another potential suspect
“We need to be convinced only that the government’s evidentiary suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of the trial.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
“AEDPA’s deferential standard does not apply if the state court employed the wrong legal standard in deciding the merits of the federal issue.” (quotation omitted)
“We need to be convinced only that ‘the government’s evidentiary suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of the trial.’ ” (quoting Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 434, 115 S.Ct. 1555, 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Seymour, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.