Traish v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s commission of several virtually identical crimes sufficed to prove a “common scheme” to “systematically bilk women drivers”
• holding that the defendant's commission of several virtually identical crimes sufficed to prove a \common scheme\ to \systematically bilk women drivers\
• holding that justice did not require separate trials
• concluding the presence of a “common scheme” satisfied the requirements for joinder
• noting the jury observed the defendant’s “build”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).