Trainor v. HEI Hospitality, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an employer “need not suspend previously planned [decisions] upon discovering that a [discrimination] suit has been filed”
• making clear that, on Rule 50 motion, reviewing court must draw \all reasonable inferences\ from the evidence favorably to nonmovant
• making clear that, on Rule 50 motion, reviewing court must draw \all reasonable inferences\ from the evidence favorably to nonmovant
• affirming front-pay award, at least partially under federal law, based on estimation of loss and plaintiffs testimony that he would continue to work for three years
• treating “temporal proximity” between protected activity and adverse action as just one factor, “reinforced by other evidence,” which supported jury verdict
• treating “temporal proximity” between adverse employment actions and protected conduct as just one factor, that must be reinforced by other evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).