Supreme Court· 4/28/1947

Trailmobile Co. v. Whirls

Citations

331 U.S. 40
67 S. Ct. 982
91 L. Ed. 1328
1947 U.S. LEXIS 2942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the “interpretation of statutes cannot safely be made to rest upon mute intermediate legislative maneuvers”
noting that the \inter- pretation of statutes cannot safely be made to rest upon mute intermediate legislative maneuvers\
noting that the \inter- pretation of statutes cannot safely be made to rest upon mute intermediate legislative maneuvers\
“The interpretation of statutes cannot safely be made to rest upon mute intermediate legislative maneuvers.”
“[T]he most important committee changes relied upon were made without explanation. The interpretation of statutes cannot safely be made to rest upon mute intermediate legislative maneuvers.” (footnote omitted)
Jackson and Frankfurter, JJ., dissenting on other grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rutledge, Jackson, Frankfurter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Trailmobile Co. v. Whirls

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.