Trahan v. Trahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The court should have all the facts possible in order to make an intelligent decision. If the attorneys fail to develop the facts, it is the trial judge’s responsibility to the children to attempt do so himself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tucker v. Tucker
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1995-10-26· cited 130×
• in the Interest of E.M., Minor Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2019-06-27
• T. A. W. and C. E. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2021-01-08
• in the Interest of A.T.M., G.B., and P.F.L., Children
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2021-06-24
• in the Interest of L.J.H., a Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2021-09-20
• In the Interest of G.M.K., a Child v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2023-08-10
• In the Interest of D.T., a Child v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2023-09-21
• In the Matter of the Marriage of Jason Bryant and Lindsey Bryant and in the Interest of B. B. and S. B., Children v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2025-05-15
• In the Interest of C.R., a Child v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2025-11-26

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stewart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-02-05· cited 24×
• Cannon v. Cannon
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1983-01-27· cited 17×
• Strauss v. Strauss
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-06-25· cited 14×
• Cozby v. Cozby
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-03-27· cited 7×