Trahan v. Trahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• res judicata is not applicable when its application would \subvert the intent of Congress and the plain meaning of the Act which is to restore state law to what it was prior to the McCarty decision.\
• partition of military retirement benefits proper remedy
• partition of military retirement benefits proper remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Flannagan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-11-25· cited 73×
• Orange County v. Ware
  Texas Supreme Court· 1991-11-20· cited 32×
• Haynes v. McIntosh
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-08-31· cited 32×
• Goad v. Goad
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-28· cited 30×
• McBride v. McBride
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-06-30· cited 26×
• Kathleen D. Kirby v. Leon G. Mellenger
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-10-20· cited 25×
• Trahan v. Trahan
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-04-05· cited 24×
• Wallace v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-10· cited 22×
• Allison v. Allison
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 15×
• O'Connor v. O'Connor
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1985-05-22· cited 14×
• Brannon v. Randmaa
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-08-12· cited 7×
• Jackson v. Green
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1985-10-10· cited 3×
• Adams v. Adams
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1990-04-11· cited 2×
• Wilbur Wallace v. Mary Lee Fuller
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1992-06-10
• Emma J. Trahan v. Jack F. Trahan
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-03-08