Skip to main content
· 6/28/1989

Traffic Jam & Snug, Inc. v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission

Citations

  • 716 F. Supp. 1024
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8186
  • 1989 WL 79669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that vessel manufacturer did not utilize vessel owners as distributors of vessel and thus did not “take advantage of an indirect marketing scheme” in manner that purposefully availed manufacturer to forum state
  • holding that vessel manufacturer did not utilize vessel owners as distributors of vessel and thus did not “take advantage of an indirect marketing scheme” in manner that purposefully availed manufacturer to forum state
  • holding foreseeability based on stream of commerce alone was insufficient basis for personal jurisdiction
  • finding Convention not a means of asserting personal jurisdiction over foreign defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duggan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.