Skip to main content
· 5/2/1997

Tradewind Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Stout

Citations

  • 938 P.2d 1196
  • 85 Haw. 177
  • 1997 Haw. App. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding privity where litigation interests “coincide[d],” i.e., where the prior party’s “interest would have been served by establishing . . . the same ultimate objective [the current party] apparently hopes to establish in the [current] action”
  • refusing to consider unauthenticated and unsworn documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Acoba, Kirimitsu

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.