· 7/8/1999
Trader Joe's Co. v. Progressive Campaigns, Inc.
Citations
- 86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442
- 73 Cal. App. 4th 425
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5468
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 6967
- 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 645
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Lane court based its holding on federal Supreme Court precedent which was subsequently overruled.”
- “In contrast to Pruneyard, ... [Trader Joe’s] contains no plazas, walkways or central courtyard where patrons may congregate and spend time together.”
- “[T]he Lane court based its holding on federal Supreme Court precedent which was subsequently overruled.”
- “In contrast to Pruneyard, ... [Trader Joe’s] contains no plazas, walkways or central courtyard where patrons may congregate and spend time together.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haerle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.