Skip to main content
· 8/3/1984

Trade Secrets Beauty Products, Inc. v. Aerial Co.

Citations

  • 102 F.R.D. 830
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • making factual findings to support sanctions under the court’s inherent authority
  • after the Court of Appeals sanctioned the main appeal, the sanctioned party withdrew the other pending appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.