Tracie Park v. Forest Service of the United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurisdiction cannot be based on events subsequent to the filing of the original complaint
• explaining that events occurring after the filing of a complaint cannot be used to establish standing
• holding that the defendant’s use □□ illegal checkpoints after the complaint was filed was irrelevant to whether the plaintiff could show _ that she faced a real and immediate threat of an illegal checkpoint at the time of filing
• explaining that to establish injury in fact for purposes of injunctive relief, a plaintiff must show that he “faces a threat of ongoing or future harm”
• stating that in “the case of complaints for injunctive relief, the injury in fact element of standing requires a showing that the plaintiff faces a threat of ongoing or future harm”
• finding that to satisfy the “injury-in-fact” requirement of standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate a real and immediate threat that he or she would again suffer a similar injury in the future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).