· 1/3/2014
Tracht Gut, LLC v. County of Los Angeles Treasurer & Tax Collector (In Re Tracht Gut, LLC)
Citations
- 503 B.R. 804
- 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 19
- 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 256
- 2014 WL 29347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no stay violation when county tax collector had no discretion in recording deed under California Revenue and Taxation Code § 3708.1
- “[djebtor did not redeem the Properties prior to the sales” and “the transfer of the Properties in this case at the sales on October 22, 2012” was before the petition date
- “A dismissal under Civil Rule 12(b)(6) may be based on either the lack of a cognizable legal theory or on the absence of sufficient facts alleged under a cognizable legal theory.”
- “A dismissal under Civil Rule 12(b)(6) may be based on either the lack of a cognizable legal theory or on the absence of sufficient facts alleged under a cognizable legal theory.”
- BAP does not ordinarily address matters 27 not argued in the opening brief
- relying on the “Foman Factors”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pappas, Taylor, Dunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.