Tracey Daley, and Other Similarly Situated Persons v. Marriott International, Inc., Tracey Daley v. Marriott Health Plan Empire Blue Cross/blue Shield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an exception to the usual requirement of identical parties applies “when a defendant stands in privity with a defendant in the prior suit”
• noting that “when . . . a litigant could have tested a magistrate[ judge]’s ruling by bringing it before the district judge, but failed to do so within the allotted ten-day period [in Rule 72(a
• referring to a motion for leave to amend the complaint as a “nondispositive pretrial motion”
• designating magistrate judge’s denial of motion to amend as an “order denying [a] nondispositive pretrial motion”
• referring to a motion for leave to amend the complaint as a “nondispositive pretrial motion”
• designating magistrate judge’s denial of motion to amend as an “order denying [a] nondispositive pretrial motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).