Skip to main content
· 3/28/2011

Trabucco v. Trabucco

Citations

  • 944 N.E.2d 544
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 536
  • 2011 WL 1119068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that trial court has broad discretion in determining value of property in dissolution action, and its valuation will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion
  • stating that trial court has broad discretion in determining value of property in dissolution action, and its valuation will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion
  • providing that when reviewing the trial court’s factual findings, we do not reweigh the evidence, but consider only the evidence favorable to the trial court’s judgment
  • “Husband’s argument is simply a request to reweigh the evidence, which we will not do on appeal.”
  • where a parent is “underemployed for a legitimate purpose other than avoiding child support, there are no grounds for imputing potential income”
  • “because the [college expenses] account was funded with marital assets, the policies behind Indiana’s one-pot theory require its inclusion within the marital estate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.