TPJ v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the juvenile court abused its discretion by ordering restitution for certain expenses not expressly contemplated by the statute
• finding that victim’s purchase of new car alarm after car break-in was not compensable, where restitution statute covered “damage or loss”
• stating that although statutes providing for the care and supervision of juvenile delinquents are entitled to liberal effect and practical construction in favor of the child's welfare, the plain language of the statute still controls our search for legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).