T.P. & S.P. Ex Rel. S.P. v. Mamaroneck Union Free School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that in finding the IEP substantively inadequate, the district court failed to defer appropriately to the decisions of the administrative experts”
• explaining that no procedural violation occurs where there is evidence that “parents meaningfully participated” in an IEP meeting
• identifying no IDEA violation where parents “meaningfully participated” in development of IEP
• identifying no IDEA violation where parents “meaningfully participated” in development of IEP
• district courts required to “defer appropriately to the decisions of the administrative experts on ... how best to transition an autistic child” from home-based educational program to school-based program
• “In considering whether [a school district] satisfied the procedural requirements of the IDEA, we focus on whether the [parents] had an adequate opportunity to participate in the development of [the] IEP.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).