Toys \R\ US, Inc. v. Canarsie Kiddie Shop, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing factors to consider in determining whether a survey is reliable
• \the similarity of the products sold by the stores compels me to conclude that the name Kids 'r' Us is likely to blur Toys 'R' Us' product identification\
• “the similarity of the children’s products sold by the stores compels me to conclude that the name Kids ‘r’ Us is likely to blur Toys ‘R’ Us’ product identification”
• “defendant’s use of a name so similar in sound and association to that of the plaintiffs was an attempt to trade on the plaintiffs goodwill, and, as such, creates a likelihood of associational confusion”
• where the products are competitive, the likelihood of confusion increases
• excluding survey because of methodological errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).