Toy Nat. Bank of Sioux City v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a patent applicant has no rights to a challenged claim
• affirming district court holding that “potential impact ... on public health and welfare was no more than speculative.”
• “The Secretary [of the Interior] has no ... duty to issue a patent prior to validity determination.”
• discussing APA and the Mandamus and Venue Act of 1962

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).