Skip to main content
· 7/8/1986

Township of Doylestown v. Zoning Hearing Board

Citations

  • 98 Pa. Commw. 539
  • 511 A.2d 940
  • 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s denial of request for discovery and evidentiary hearing where the petitioner could not demonstrate either that § 2254(e)(2) did not apply to him or that he could satisfy § 2254(e)(2
  • affirming district court’s denial of request for discovery and evidentiary hearing where the petitioner could not demonstrate either that § 2254(e)(2) did not apply to him or that he could satisfy § 2254(e)(2)’s requirements
  • explaining § 2254(e)(2)’s stringent standard for expanding the habeas record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, MacPhail, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.