Skip to main content
· 6/7/1898

Townsend v. Price

Citations

  • 19 Wash. 415
  • 53 P. 668
  • 1898 Wash. LEXIS 400

Syllabus

<p>JUDGMENT AGAINST INSANE PERSON — GUARDIAN AD LITEM — PLEADING.</p> <p>Where plaintiff knows, either at the time of service of summons or at the time of rendition of judgment that defendant is non compos mentis it is Incumbent on him to suggest it to the court, in order that a guardian ad Utem may he appointed.</p> <p>In an action upon a judgment of a court of record of ia sister state, an answer alleging that the judgment had been Obtained fraudulently by default, through personal service upon defendant while insane, and that there was .a valid defense to the original action, states sufficient facts to constitute a defense, as against a motion for judgment on the pleadings, as pleadings are liberally construed upon such a motion.</p>

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.